The Red Flag Report

You do not just
buy the home.
You buy what is wrong with it.

You get twenty minutes at a showing. I had eleven years on the tools.

Nearly half the BC strata built between 1985 and 2000 needed an envelope repair. It was costed, written down and filed before you ever saw the place.

Send me the free checklist→

Free. Straight to your inbox. No pressure.

Rather talk it through? Book a free 15-minute review.

71 Google reviewsMedallion Club, top 10% Greater Vancouver

Hidden in the depreciation report

Envelope repair, your share

$80,000

Costed in the report. Never put to a vote. Never shown on the listing.

Illustrative sample

See the full sample reports→

#37

Individual agent, eXp Canada 2025

$105M+

Career sales volume

Top 10%

Greater Vancouver, 2023 & 2025

01 / Where the money actually goes

Everything that makes a home expensive is invisible on a Saturday afternoon.

What the showing sells you

New kitchen

Fresh paint

Good light

Nice finishes

All of it real. None of it expensive.

Illustrative. Figures are typical Greater Vancouver ranges, and the oil tank number is a documented North Vancouver case, not an average.

What it doesn't

An addition built without a permit, and never finalled

$60k to $95k

Envelope work the depreciation report already flagged

$54,000

A roof shared with a neighbour you have not met

$18k to $26k

Plumbing inside the wall that insurers have started repricing

Premium up

A buried oil tank nobody has scanned for

up to $85k

Any one of these outweighs every upgrade inside.

Send me the free checklist→

Free. Straight to your inbox. No pressure.

Four kinds of home. Four different ways it costs you.

Same report either way. What I am reading changes completely.

Condo

Built 1994 · 32 years old

High risk

Looked immaculate. The building had already costed the work and never funded it.

Face-sealed construction from before rainscreening was required
A reserve that has not met its own target since 2022
Rainscreen costed in the depreciation report with no funding motion passed
A water-damage deductible that doubled at the last renewal

Costed, unfunded, and due. That is high risk, not a maybe.

Townhouse

Built 2005 · 21 years old

Watch

Low fees, tidy complex, and one roofline shared between eleven owners.

Roofs, siding and decks that all come due in the same few years
A small strata with almost nothing set aside
Self-managed books, with minutes that stop partway through the year
Rainscreen work on a complex too small to absorb it

The same bill split between far fewer people is a different bill.

Detached

Built 1978 · 48 years old

High risk

Presented as renovated. None of the work that mattered was ever permitted.

A buried oil tank nobody has scanned for. Clean removal runs about $5,000; one North Vancouver owner reached $85,000 once the soil was contaminated
An unpermitted suite the City can order shut down
That order can void your insurance and end the rental income you qualified for the mortgage with
Asbestos on anything pre-1991, which turns a renovation into an abatement

Permits, tanks and title all follow you to your own resale.

Half duplex

Built 2008 · 18 years old

Watch

Two owners, no manager, no reserve fund, and one roof between you.

Eighteen years old, which is precisely when the roof comes due
A two-lot strata, exempt from depreciation reports entirely
A $0 strata fee, which means nothing is being set aside for it
Fire separation that stops at the ceiling instead of the roof deck

The cheapest strata fee in the city is not a saving.

02 / What you actually get

Four homes. Four answers. One of them is “walk away.”

Some of these are a no, and the no is worth more to you than the yes. Open each one and see how differently they read.

Sample · Red Flag Report

Condo · 2 bed · Kitsilano · built 1994

Asking $1,145,000

Verdict

Not at this price

The unit is not the problem. The building has costed a major project, failed to fund it, and has not sent the bill yet. It is coming.

What it costs to own

Asking priceLive data: $1,145,000
Strata feesLive data: $598 / mo
Price per sq ftLive data: $1,043
Rainscreen work, your shareFrom docs: $54,000 to $68,000

What the record says

Reserve has not met its own target since 2022
Form B + AGM minutesFrom docs
Rainscreen costed in the report, no funding motion passed
Depreciation reportFrom docs
Water-damage deductible doubled at the last renewal
Form B insurance summaryFrom docs
Bylaws set a 30-day minimum stay
Kyle’s bylaw dataLive data

The trade read · what I look for on site

A 1994 building is face-sealed, not rainscreened, which is the whole problem with this vintage. The listing photos show sealant failure at the window perimeters on the weather elevation, and that is exactly where water gets in. Once it is behind the cladding you are not repairing a seal, you are re-cladding an elevation, and that is a different number than the one in the report.

Observations from eleven years in construction and six in the fire service. This is not a home inspection and does not replace one.

Can you short-term rent it?

30-day minimum, not an Airbnb unitLive data

Bylaws permit rentals but set a 30-day floor. That is month-to-month. BC defines short-term as under 30 days.

Live dataPulled from my MLS data. Real and current.From docsOnly visible once someone pulls the documents.

Composite properties, assembled from common patterns. Figures are illustrative and do not describe any real listing, building, or strata corporation.

Send me the free checklist→

Free. Straight to your inbox. No pressure.

04 / What eleven years on site buys you

Three separate six-figure problems. One eleven year window.

They come out of three different decades and three different industries and have nothing to do with each other. Nobody planned for them to overlap. The build year is on every listing, so checking takes about four seconds.

Three problems, three decades, one overlap

1985 to 1996eleven years, and a home in there can be carrying all three at once

AsbestosAnything before 1990

Drywall mud, floor tile and adhesive, textured ceilings, attic vermiculite.

Poly B plumbingHeavy install 1985 to 1997

Degrades from the inside out. The outside of the pipe looks perfectly normal.

No rainscreenBefore 1996 in Vancouver

Face-sealed walls with no drainage cavity. The coastal code caught up in 2006.

What makes this expensive

Nothing about the house tells you. From the sidewalk it is a nice nineties place somebody has kept up beautifully. The one to be careful with is the untouched one: original everything, one owner since new, never renovated because they never needed to. That home shows the best and carries the full set.

45%

of BC strata units built 1985 to 2000 ended up with envelope leak problems

650k

Canadian homes were plumbed with Poly B, and insurers are repricing it now

1990

and older triggers a WorkSafeBC hazmat survey before any demolition or renovation

Sources: WorkSafeBC; Government of BC; City of Vancouver Building Bylaw; BC Building Code; reporting on BC building envelope failures 1985 to 2000, in which roughly 45% of the 159,979 strata units built in that window were affected. Building envelope remediation is reported at $30,000 to $80,000 per unit, the single largest financial event most stratas ever face. Oil tank figures: a clean removal with uncontaminated soil runs roughly $5,000 to $6,000; the $85,000 case is a North Vancouver homeowner reported by CBC News, and it is a documented worst case rather than an average. Every figure on this page was re-verified against a primary source before it was published.

03 / Why me and not a checklist off the internet

You get twenty minutes. I had eleven years.

I worked on these places before I sold them. Eleven years on the tools as a Red Seal sprinkler fitter, foreman at twenty-one, then six years with Delta Fire. I ran the life-safety systems into buildings like the one you are about to buy into, and I have been inside them on the worst day they ever had.

That is a different set of eyes than an agent who has only seen a building from the lobby. I know where water gets in, which separations get skipped, and which repairs are about to stop being optional.

What that adds to the file

Whether the flagged work is cosmetic or structural

Whether a quoted repair scope is realistic

Where this build type usually fails, and at what age

What the depreciation report, or the permit history, is really describing

To be clear: I am a REALTOR® with a construction background, not a licensed home inspector, engineer, or lawyer. This does not replace an inspection. It tells you where to point one.

Send me the free checklist→

Free. Straight to your inbox. No pressure.

05 / Why this matters right now

The paperwork just got better. Almost nobody opens it.

Condo and townhouse

A report exists, and it is new

Every strata in Metro Vancouver just had to produce a depreciation report. The waiver is gone and the deadline has passed.

Thousands of buildings have written down what they must spend, and when
Form B now carries an insurance summary too
It is sitting on almost every listing you are looking at

The problem is written down. Somebody just has to read it.

Detached and half duplex

No report is coming, ever

Nobody is obliged to write the problem down for you. A two-lot duplex strata is exempt from depreciation reports entirely.

The City file is the equivalent, and it is open to anyone who asks
Permits pulled, permits closed, and the ones never finalled
On a duplex the roof is a conversation with your neighbour

Same principle, different filing cabinet. Most buyers open neither.

06 / The evidence

Your risk is not the same as their risk.

Every active Vancouver listing that publishes a build year, sorted into the eras that decide what a home costs to own. Find your own row: what you are buying decides which problem you get, and they are not the same problem.

Built 1984 or earlierBuilt 1985 to 1996Built 1997 or later

Condo2,153 listings

14.3%

76.7%

Roughly one in seven is face-sealed construction from before rainscreening was required.

Townhouse453 listings

85.2%

Mostly modern stock, so the risk here is the SIZE of the strata rather than its age.

Detached1,268 listings

60.3%

12.2%

27.4%

Six in ten predate 1985, and 66% predate 1991, which is the point a renovation can trigger a WorkSafeBC hazardous materials survey. On a house, old is the default: assume asbestos and a buried tank until someone proves otherwise.

Half duplex415 listings

93.7%

Almost all of them are post-1996, so age is barely the issue. The two-lot strata with no reserve fund is.

Active Vancouver listings carrying a published build year, from my own feed of the board data, as of 2026-09-02. Shares are of listings that publish a year, not of all actives, because roughly one in eight does not state one.

What the market is not telling you

Nobody is discounting these buildings. Including the other bidders.

I compared every condo sale in my service area, split by the era the building went up. If the envelope window carried a discount, it would show here. It does not.

Sold against asking

97.3%1985 to 1996vs97.3%1997 or later

Identical. Buyers are paying the same share of asking for a face-sealed 1990 building as for a 2015 one. 2,088 and 8,596 sales.

Strata fee, per sq ft

$0.581985 to 1996vs$0.611997 or later

The older buildings charge slightly LESS per foot. The fee does not warn you, and underfunding is exactly what makes the levy big.

Days on market

171985 to 1996vs221997 or later

They sell faster than newer stock, so you will be competing, not negotiating.

You get no discount for the risk, no warning in the fee, and no hesitation from the people bidding against you. Reading the documents is the only edge left.

Median values from my own feed of the board data, 2026-09-02, across the eight municipalities I work. Sold against asking is measured on the ORIGINAL list price. I have deliberately left price per square foot out of this comparison: older buildings are cheaper per foot because they are older, and no honest reading of it separates that from envelope risk.

Why that window exists

Two walls. One of them drains.

Eleven years on sites watching these walls go up. This is the entire difference between a building that dries out and a building that rots, and you cannot see it from the lobby or from any photograph.

Built 1985 to 1996

Face-sealed

CladdingSheathingFraming

The outer face is the only thing keeping water out. When a seal fails, and they all fail eventually, the water has nowhere to go and no way to dry. That is the leaky condo era in one drawing.

Built 1997 or later

Rainscreen

CladdingAir cavityMembraneSheathingFraming

A drained cavity behind the cladding. Water still gets past the face, because it always does. The difference is that here it runs down the gap and out at the base instead of into the wall.

Simplified section drawings. BC moved to rainscreen construction for most multi-family and many other buildings from 1997 following the envelope failures of the preceding decade, so a build year is a strong clue and not a guarantee. The assembly is confirmed in the documents, which is the point.

What the sold data says

Measured against sales, not repeated from the internet.

I fit these on Greater Vancouver sales and then test them against sales the model has never seen. Anything that does not survive that gets published as unproven or thrown out. Some of the most useful findings are the ones where the answer turned out to be nothing.

A renovation is worth about 4.4% per condition grade on a detached house

Scored from listing photographs, then tested against sales the model had never seen. It cut my own valuation error from 12.5% to 10.6%, which is why it is priced on detached and only watched on the other three.

Confirmed out of sample

t = 2.88 out of sample

Every 1% a home is overpriced adds about four days on market

The strongest relationship in the whole dataset. Five percent over what it eventually sells for costs roughly three extra weeks. For a buyer that runs backwards: a listing sitting far past the local median is usually telling you its price is wrong, not that nobody noticed it.

Strong

t = 53.1, n = 8,776 condo sales

Concrete construction does not command a premium over wood frame

Once age and neighbourhood are held constant, the difference is indistinguishable from noise. Buyers routinely pay up for the word "concrete" on a listing. The data does not support it.

Measured, no effect

t = 1.4, not significant

The MLS view checkbox means nothing. A described view is worth real money

The tick box is on 58% of listings and carries no measurable premium. A water view actually written into the description is worth about $41 a square foot. The field agents fill in casually is noise; the one they write on purpose is signal.

Measured, no effect

checkbox t = -0.5, described view t = 6.7

An extra bedroom helps a townhouse and hurts a condo

Chopping an 800 square foot condo into another bedroom measures at about minus $11 a foot. The same move on a 1,400 square foot townhouse is worth about plus $37. Identical renovation advice is right for one and wrong for the other, which is why segment matters more than general rules.

Strong

condo t = -3.1, townhouse t = 7.5

Which way the windows face does not move the price

Tested across all eight orientations on both condos and townhouses. Nothing survives. Exposure is worth caring about for how you will live in a home, and not for what you should pay for it.

Measured, no effect

noise across all eight directions

07 / Where to start

Three ways in. Most people only need the first.

Nothing below is a prerequisite for anything above it, and the checklist is yours to keep whether or not you ever take the other two.

Free

Building Red Flags

The checklist

46 checks in the order I actually run them, across condos, townhouses, detached homes and duplexes. It prints, so it goes to the showing with you.

Send me the checklist→

Free

The 15-Minute Review

On a call, with me

No property required. We go through what actually costs money in the type of home you are looking at, and what to ask before you remove subjects.

Book the review→

Your property

The Red Flag Report

On the home you want

Send me the address. I read the documents, the permit history and the title on that specific home, and write up what I would want to know before writing on it.

Send me an address→

The review and the report are how I meet clients, so I am not pretending otherwise. You are under no obligation to work with me for either, and if a home is a bad buy I will say so.

Start here / free

Building
Red Flags

46 checks, in the order I actually run them, written from the trade side rather than the sales side. It prints, so you can take it to a showing.

01Start with the build year

02Find the plumbing yourself

03Read the envelope from the sidewalk

04Asbestos: the cost is at the permit counter

05Go look at the actual wood

06The one question to ask about a new build

07Check what cannot be renewed

08Features that fail in real life

09If it is a strata, read the paper

08 / Why this exists

I kept watching the same thing happen.

Eleven years building these places. Red Seal sprinkler fitter, foreman at twenty-one. Then six years with Delta Fire, which meant walking into the same buildings on the worst day they ever had.

Then I started selling them, and the pattern never changed. Somebody buys. Four months later the bill lands: a levy, a roof, a repair nobody mentioned. And almost every time, it had already been written down somewhere before they made the offer. Nobody had shown them where to look.

I would rather lose a commission than watch you inherit somebody else’s deferred maintenance.
Kyle Mark *PRECeXp Realty · Vancouver

09 / Before you ask

What people ask me first.

What is the Building Red Flags checklist?

46 checks across nine sections, in the order I actually run them: build year, the plumbing, the envelope read from the sidewalk, asbestos, the framing, the one question worth asking on a new build, what cannot be renewed, and the strata paperwork if there is any. It is free, it prints, and it is yours whether or not we ever speak.

Do I need to have a property picked out?

No. Most people who book the review are still comparing neighbourhoods, or deciding between a townhouse and a half duplex. That is the useful moment to have the conversation, not after you have already written.

Is the review the same as the report?

No. The review is a call about the kind of home you are looking at and what tends to cost money in it. The report is written, and it is about one specific address, once you are serious enough about it to want the documents read.

Is this a home inspection?

No, and I am careful about this one. I am a REALTOR® with a construction and fire background, not a licensed home inspector, engineer or lawyer. I will tell you where to point an inspection and what to ask. I will not tell you a building is sound.

Will you actually tell me not to buy?

Yes. One of the four sample reports on this page says walk away, and that is not decoration. I would rather lose a commission than watch you inherit somebody else’s deferred maintenance.

What if I am not buying for a year?

Better, honestly. The checklist is far more useful before you have fallen for something. None of it expires, and knowing what to avoid changes which places you bother viewing.

Am I obligated to work with you?

No. Take the checklist, never speak to me again, and it has still done its job. The review and the report are how I meet clients, which I would rather say plainly than pretend otherwise.

Does this only apply to older buildings?

No. New construction has its own list: a deposit tied up if the project stalls, a completion date that moves by a year, starter strata fees set low that jump after the first real budget, and warranty fine print that costs thousands. Different problems, same principle.

Which homes does this cover?

Condos, townhouses, detached houses and half duplexes, across Vancouver, Burnaby, New Westminster, the North Shore, Coquitlam and Richmond. The checklist itself travels anywhere; the market read is Greater Vancouver.

Why is any of it free?

Because the alternative is you finding out in month four. If some of you hire me later, that more than pays for it. If you do not, I would still rather you had the list than not.

Send me the free checklist→

Free. Straight to your inbox. No pressure.

Before you write

Found one you like? Let me read it first.

Send me the address. Fifteen minutes, no charge, and no obligation to work with me afterwards.

What it actually costs to own

The fees, the levy nobody has voted on yet, and the tax.

What the documents really say

The few pages that matter out of the hundreds most buyers skim.

Whether the price holds up

What comparable homes sold for, not what this one is asking.

When walking away is the answer

What to ask, and the point at which I would tell you to stop.

Book the free review→

Or text me: (604) 288-7245

Send me the 46 checks →

You do not justbuy the home.You buy what is wrong with it.

Everything that makes a home expensive is invisible on a Saturday afternoon.

Four kinds of home. Four different ways it costs you.

Four homes. Four answers. One of them is “walk away.”

Three separate six-figure problems. One eleven year window.

You get twenty minutes. I had eleven years.

The paperwork just got better. Almost nobody opens it.

Your risk is not the same as their risk.

Nobody is discounting these buildings. Including the other bidders.

Two walls. One of them drains.

Measured against sales, not repeated from the internet.

Three ways in. Most people only need the first.

BuildingRed Flags

Send me the checklist

I kept watching the same thing happen.

What people ask me first.

Found one you like? Let me read it first.

You do not just
buy the home.
You buy what is wrong with it.

Building
Red Flags